I hate to say "I told you so"
Thursday, 25 September 2008
I hate to say "I told you so" but it's starting to pan out more like a very bad version of a very, very good George Orwell novel over in the US right now.
Remember when I suggested that the November elections might not happen in the US? Remember how I suggested that Bush might call in use of Presidential Directive NSPD 51 and decide to become King Dubya The First - for all eternity?
Well. Guess what?
You know, I really, really hate being right - especially when it's about nasty, greedy, horrible slimeball stuff of the sort going on right now in the US. I hate apathy, I hate ignorance - and I really, really hate people who sit on their butts waiting for someone else to stop the hurting happening. I hate the "somebody must do something!" catchcry that is all over the net right now - especially on US blogs.
Anyway. I'll continue.
In case you're unaware of the situation at present, McCain has just called off his campaign. Yep, sounds like a pretty big crisis to me.
So - next question is: how will elections take place on time without campaigning? My guess is they won't. That nasty little NSPD 51, which few noticed at the time, gives Dubya Dictatorial Powers in any sort of a crisis that he chooses to call - well, a 'crisis'.
In short, we have a cosy little Republican set-up where McCain calls off his campaign, leaving Obama in a sticky situation with not much option but to do likewise or look pretty bad. Bush delays elections. Whacko. Instant Fuhrer Bush.
Think it won't happen? Really? Really? You're more positive than me, I guess.
What can we do?
What we're seeing in the US is a massive departure from democracy to dictatorship under the guise of necessary economic overhaul. This is a power grab using shock tactics - be under no illusions it is about anything else. And althought it's just the US at the moment, it could have knock-on effects that could change the political shape of the world. I mean, if it works for them, what's to stop our leaders following suit with a few NSPD 51s of their own?
The thought is chilling.
But I digress...
What would happen if the $700 billion bailout didn't happen? No-one really knows. The US dollar would devalue significantly, but that will happen regardless. And, of course, the big question with the bailout is - who is going to buy the treasury bonds? Would you? I sure as hell wouldn't.
There is talk of the Japanese being keen to invest in discount US banks etc., at the moment, and this was spun on CNN last night as being a good sign, but the reality couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is, the Japs own 25% of US foreign debt, and if the US goes down in a shuddering heap, it could take Japan with it. Their keenness is nothing more than a desperation to prevent their own economy tumbling. (As an aside, the other big shareholder in US foreign debt is China, controlling about 20%. The remainder of the debt is smaller chunks).
If the bailout doesn't happen, the US economy will fall apart, but that will probably happen with the bailout anyway, just a bit later on. But at least if the bailout doesn't happen, no more debt is created to throw at bad debt. The cycle slows, rather than gathering momentum. That's my Economics understanding of it all - please correct me if I'm wrong.
As to the rest of us, the fall of the US is pretty much a foregone conclusion. I think what we will see eventually is a return to the gold standard and a complete mistrust of fiat currencies. We can blame Nixon (that bugger) of course, for closing the gold window and setting the huge chain of debt and inflation spiralling in the first place, but other factors have since played a role.
We're in for a depression, peoples. All of us. If you can, secure land that will grow food, clear your debts quickly, and build strong community. These three things have helped keep people afloat in hard times before, and they will work again. Do NOT assume that your retirement funds will be there when you need them, and do not put any more money into superannuation that you have to - these are times when you want as much control over your income as possible. Buy land, grow food, build community.
In the US, if you live in a rough area, get out of it. If you are a racial or cultural minority in your town, you might want to think twice about staying there. If you can move to another country with fewer weapons in private hands, you might want to consider doing so. And get yourself healthy - health care may be sketchy at best.
In the meanwhile, the bailout and depression haven't started - yet. Now is the time to prepare, prepare, prepare. Fight this bailout with everything you have, and organise dissent and community groups if at all possible. Don't look back in ten years thinking: "we could have done something, but we didn't." Now is the time to grow strong roots. Just don't be surprised if the elections don't happen on schedule. No-one will be more suprised than me if they do happen.











10 comments:
This all scares the s**t out of me.
Kate
Hi Kate,
This is scares the crap out of me too.
I keep thinking, maybe I don't understand it ell enough, because I'm not scared enough yet.
But then I realise I've been aware of all this and preparing for it for years. Maybe that's why I'm not so a scared as I should be - after a while you just get used to anything.
But I'm angry - because the majority of the western population are STILL sticking their heads in the sand and saying "this can't be happening!"
Trust me, this has all been *very* carefully and cleverly orchestrated. It just fits together too neatly.
The thing that worries me most is the nxt step in it all. We're looking at two world superpowers - the US and China - both being authoritarian dictatorships, and both fighting over limited natural resources.
In the past whenever that has happened, there have been wars. That's human history in a nutshell. Every time, in every case. The markers are always the same - and right now, the markers couldn't be clearer. We're repeating the 1930s, with a few differences that make everything much, much worse.
[Augh - I'm Cassandra-ing] ;-(
I can't help but see war close in our future. And that scares me more than any depression might. *That's* what we're really facing - a resource war to end everything.
This has to end now. Too much is at stake, and it isn't just economic prosperity. We have to stop these lunatics, and get some sanity back into the system NOW.
(and I'll get down off my pedestal and shut up NOW)
I agree with you, depressions lead to wars. Let's hope, for all of us and our children, that war can be avoided. Although the US is a superpower, they owe an awful lot of money to China, so the balance of world power could easily shift.
Kate
I guess I'm not feeling scared yet - just waiting for the sh*t to hit the fan so we can get on with things. I'm about as prepared as I'm going to be at this stage - have a couple of months worth of food, have some savings and am ahead on the mortgage with no other debts.
The idea of war scares me more though.
BTW - I posted a link to this post on the Simple Savings site - hope that's ok.
McCain hasn't withdrawn his name from the ballot or anything, he's just said he's not going to campaign (no debates or speeches or public meetings) until the bailout legislation is sorted out. The statement says 'I am confident that before the markets open on Monday we can achieve consensus on legislation', which sounds like he expects to be back at it within the week.
I'm not worried about Fuhrer Bush. If I was American, I'd be worried about Paulson asking for permission to spend $700 billion on whatever he deems fit without congressional or judicial oversight, and the possibility of banks being declared national assets and thus worthy of protection from the armed forces if need be...
For myself, I'm not any more scared than I was a month ago. We have peak oil and climate change to deal with, economies tanking seems kinda inevitable, we were already so very doomed...
I have to admit right now all this scares me out of my wits.
Our debt exposure, home loan, is still too high at this point for me to be in any way comfortable that if things start to get out of control we are Ok.. I have been trying to reduce that in a big way by removing our loans on non essential assets but for one reason or another I have been hampered by circumstances since Dec last year in being able to do this. Its as sorted as it can be right now as the complications have finally been resolved and sale papers have been signed but needless to say even in Australia the current market is at best described as sluggish.
The entirety of the world situation as it currently stands is giving me nightmares... and that's my mindset when I am not actively considering the fact that my DH, another lifetime ago reserves trained, is prime age to be considered cannon fodder if we end up in a draft.
The only thing that makes me think the US elections, even after that announcement, just might happen, although maybe not on time, is that I don't think they are ready to signal that level of Crisis to their general populace yet.. That would be one genie that couldn't be put back in the bottle from a PR point of view... its a thin hope but right now it is mine.
Kind Regards
Belinda
Hey guys, I have tinfoil hats selling for only $5 on ebay!
Seriously, where in all that legislation does it say that the President can delay elections?
Hmmm?
Point me to it.
On the contrary, it say,
"This directive shall be implemented in a manner that is consistent with, and facilitates effective implementation of, provisions of the Constitution concerning succession to the Presidency or the exercise of its powers, and the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (3 U.S.C. 19), with consultation of the Vice President and, as appropriate, others involved."
This is just a directive so that if, say, Tom Clancy's novel happens, some crazy plunges a plane into Congress when they're voting to appoint a new President or something, then government goes on. "Consistent with the Constitution", it says. That means you get two terms of four years. No extensions.
Concentrating power is just one of its options. It also foresees,
"Succession orders and pre-planned devolution of authorities that ensure the emergency delegation of authority must be planned and documented in advance in accordance with applicable law"
so if for example the US copped a few nuclear missiles from some whacky country, then all the various state and local authorities could keep things going. That's what "devolution" means - handing your powers to someone lower down the chain.
McCain has not "called off" his campaign, he's suspended it. That means he'll start it up again later. What he's saying is that his current job as a Senator is more important to do today than the job he's going for as President. It's like a surgeon interrupting an interview for Chief of Surgical Staff to go and do an operation.
Now, any takers for the tinfoil hats? Guaranteed to shut out the orbital mind control lasers!
You have hit the nail on the head Daharja. I made a similar post on the situation the other day.
What you see is what many of us see, and as you say, have been seeing for a few years.
Like you, we arent surprised either, we just keep on prepping, trying to show others the light and hope for the best in a horrendous situation brought about by greed, corruption and control
Blessings:)
Ok... deep breath taken.
Looking at the situation with a bit more of a rational head I have to agree with GWAG that I think the elections will happen. Even if it was constitutionally possible for them not to occur it would send exactly the wrong message to the populace at a point in time when the government needs them to believe that "business as usual" is still a reality.
Americans thus far have given a lot of ground in their willingness to accept government control, most of which they truly resent the perceived need for. A move such as the one you described would have to cause absolute anarchy... their military is stretched as it is I have to believe having their entire population in revolt would have to be an absolutely insane move.
The economic situation which is mainly what I am reacting too in my previous comment is dire and still scares me silly. Too much flux..and I can see things devolving really quickly as the brave new "global economy" means that chaos to this extent is going to touch us all where ever we live.
Anyone who believes that the resources to drive our hungry economies are dwindling has to accept the fact that the countries that still think they have money are gonna be there fighting for the dregs. Whether our next war is about our politicians deciding that the way to rebuild a depression economy is war cause it worked last time or a knock down drag out over access to what they consider "essential resources" at this point I don't want to hazard a guess.
Kind Regards
Belinda
Seriously, the US Army and some Presidential directive is not a threat to US democracy.
Here are some threats to US democracy:-
- voting fraud, carried out by dodgy voting machines and counting methods
- voter disenfranchisement, carried out by removing the vote from those with a felony conviction, or those with same name as someone with a felony conviction
- voter disenfranchisement, carried out by having Republican staffers challenge any black or hispanic who comes into the voting booth so that it becomes a "provisional" vote which is often then thrown away
- voter disenfranchisement, carried out by the voters themselves, more than half of all eligible voters don't vote at all
Between fraud, disenfranchisement and public apathy, you don't need the Army to end US democracy. You're doing it yourselves.
What the US needs is,
1. An independent electoral commission, so that the voting process is uniform across the country and not interfered with by party-partisan officials.
You don't let the coach of a football team be a referee in the match, why would you let the party-affiliated Secretary of State oversee elections?
2. Compulsory voting.
When everyone is obliged to vote, then no-one can be prevented from voting.
The greatest threat to US democracy is not the Army. It's your own apathy. These sorts of stories are designed to distract you from the real problems. It's like having a Presidential sex scandal while some country is being bombed.
Post a Comment